From its earliest beginnings in a 1647, when the Massachusetts General Court required every town in the colony with a population of more than fifty people to found, operate and fund schools, public education in the United States today has grown to encompass more than 15,000 separate school districts across the United States. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, there are now 98,817 public schools. The U.S. Department of Education reports that the country currently spends over $ 500 billion a year on public elementary and secondary education, K-12, and that, on average, school districts spend $ 10,591.00 per pupil. Lately, much has appeared in the print media about the malaise of public education in the United States. Numerous reforms have been proposed, many of which involve empowering school administrators, testing students regularly, eliminating collective bargaining rights and tenure for teachers, holding teachers accountable for student performance, and creating more charter schools. Some of the more extreme measures proposed would dismantle public education entirely but use taxpayer funds to replace it with a system of vouchers for use in private schools and for-profit schools. Today, ?private school choice? programs, as these vouchers are called by the Alliance for School Choice, have been enacted in 13 states and the District of Columbia. Last year, during a time when states across the nation drastically slashed spending for public education budgets, 41 states introduced 145 pieces of private school choice legislation. The net effect of the more extreme proposals would be to remove education from public oversight and regulation, and permit unlicensed, poorly-paid and poorly-educated individuals to teach creationism, others forms of pseudo-science, extremist religious doctrines, and right-wing politics, history and economics without fear of censure and without any accountability whatsoever. A number of the reforms that have gained cachet in the mainstream media have been touted by President Obama?s Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Walton Foundation, the Broad Foundation, and former D.C. Superintendent of Schools, Michelle Rhee, among others. Interestingly, none of these proponents of public school reform have ever taught in a public school or have any direct experience in trying to challenge students, particularly students under stress, to learn. The larger question, however, is: will any of their proposed reforms actually improve public education in the United States or will they further undermine it? The October edition of Atlantic magazine, Nicole Allen documents the travails of American public education. Students in the United States ranks 21st among counties in Science; 14th in reading skills, and 30th in Mathematics skills, according to the International Student Assessment for 2009. By contrast, students in Finland rank 2nd in Science, 3rd in reading sills, and 6th in Mathematics skills. Many might argue that any comparison between Finland and the U.S. is meaningless, given the size of the population and racial diversity of the U.S. in contrast to Finland. But is it possible that the example of Finland can still instruct, and if so, how? First, Finland has created uniformly high standards for all of its students and those standards are supported and insured throughout the entire country. This is in stark contrast to the U.S. where the federal government and the states impose, at best, minimal requirements upon local school districts. Secondly, only 7% of the applicants to the University of Helsinki?s teacher programs are accepted. Upon completion of their education and practicum, teachers in Finland are paid more than 80% of the average of full-time earnings of college-educated adults in that country. By contrast, in the United States, teachers are uniformly poorly paid and are often recruited from the bottom quartile of college graduates. As the Atlantic data shows, even in more selective education programs such as those at Johns Hopkins School of Education and at Columbia University?s Teachers College, 53% and 56% of the applicants respectively are accepted. Third, teachers in Finland, as recognized and valued professionals ? all of whom are also unionized ? are given great latitude in their methods of teaching; and collegiality, rather than a top-down management model, governs decision-making in the schools. By contrast, here in the United States, the GE management model of public execution and intimidation ? exemplified by the likes of Michelle Rhee ? controls educational discourse. Lastly, and most importantly, Finland?s education system succeeds because its students are ready and prepared to learn. As a social democracy, Finland has perhaps the Western world?s most extensive safety net. The country has universal medical care, strong family-support, child welfare, and nutritional programs, minimal poverty and its population would never tolerate the kind of extreme economic inequality that is currently fashionable in the United States . Here in the United States, the evidence shows that the problems caused by a decentralized, unequally-funded system of local public education are compounded by the existence and tolerance of widespread economic and social inequality which also explains, in large part, the uneven outcomes in America?s decentralized education system and the dismal performance of so many of the children who are enrolled. In a report released in March 2009, David Berliner, Regents Professor at Arizona State University, analyzed those ?out-of-school factors? (OSFs) which ?play a powerful role in generating existing achievement gaps? that continue to undermine the purpose of the federal ?No Child Left Behind? act. Berliner, in a wide-ranging review of the existing data and summary of the educational literature, identified six significant factors among poor children that adversely affected their health and learning opportunities and which therefore ?limit what schools can accomplish on their own: (1) low birth weight and non- genetic prenatal influences on children; (2) inadequate medical, dental, and vision care, often a result of inadequate or no medical insurance; (3) food insecurity; (4) environmental pollutants; (5) family relations and family stress; and (6) neighborhood characteristics.? These six factors, Berliner concluded, ?are related to a host of poverty- induced physical, sociological and psychological problems that children often bring to school, ranging from neurological damage and attention disorders to excessive absenteeism, linguistic under-development, and oppositional behavior.? Berliner further observed that, ?Because America?s schools are so highly segregated by income, race, and ethnicity, problems related to poverty occur simultaneously, with greater frequency, and act cumulatively in schools serving disadvantaged communities. These schools therefore face significantly greater challenges than schools serving wealthier communities, and their limited resources are often overwhelmed.? The data which Berliner cites showed that, in 2006-2007, the average white student attended a public school in which about 30 percent of the students were classified as low-income. By contrast, the average black or Hispanic student attended a school in which nearly 60 percent of the students were classified as low-income, while the average American Indian was enrolled in a school where more than half of the students were poor. ?These schools,? Berliner concluded, ?are often dominated by the many dimensions of intense, concentrated, and isolated poverty that shape the lives of students and families.? Horace Mann believed that education had the potential to become ?the great equalizer in the conditions of men.? For that reason, he became an early advocate of the importance of public education for all citizens. Later, John Dewey insisted that ?Since a democratic society repudiates the principle of external authority, it must find a substitute in voluntary disposition and interest; these can be created only by education.? The continued de-funding and fragmentation of American public education- as exemplified by the growth of charter school movement ? coupled with the relentless, continuing assault upon teachers, the imposition of management models dawn from the private sector, the continued dumbing down of curricula, and proposals to turn public education over to entrepreneurs and for-profit business are precisely the wrong direction for American public education. Sadly also, these proposals show how far this country has strayed from the grand visions of Horace Mann and John Dewey. In his important book, What Money Can?t Buy, Harvard University political philosopher Michael Sandel warns against the continued creep of the values of market economy into the public square, the end result of which he fears will be the creation of a market society in which everyone and everything is for sale. Decades earlier, the Marxist philosopher and social critic, Herbert Marcuse argued that ?An economic system that encourages its young men and women to tailor their educations to the needs of the marketplace, irrespective of their hopes and ambitions, is an economic system that should be roundly condemned. A nation that discourages the study of art, music and the Humanities is a nation that will inevitably find itself populated by unthinking dolts and automatons.? Everyone who is concerned about the future of this fragile democracy and about the education of our children and grandchildren must hope that it is not too late to reverse the trend toward the continued corporatization of American public education.Related articles
Related posts:
- Privateers and Public Education: They Want the Money
- Educator and Bilingual-Ed. Foe Remains in Romney?s Corner ? Politics K-12 ? Education
- Common Core State Standards Dividing GOP ? Politics K-12 ? Education Week
- Gallup: Public Schools Worst Place to Educate Children
- Chicago Teachers Strike a Critical Moment in the Future of Public Education
jeremy renner justin timberlake engaged bluefin tuna jonestown john dillinger carlos zambrano clemson
No comments:
Post a Comment